Monday, June 17, 2013

If Liberals Are So Worried About Child Safety, Why AreThey Pro- Abortion?

I have watched, with mounting nausea, as B.O. surrounds himself with children.  Hitler used the same tactic, you can google pictures that look remarkably similar to the ones that b.o. uses to try and advance his agenda.  I don't buy it.
I think that having  a gun is a much better deterrent than soiling myself, using a "rape whistle" or any of the other stupid,    idiotic,  asinine ideas to come out of the current administration.  I don't think that a person who is hell bent on hurting me or my children will be stopped by me blowing a whistle.  I do think that they would be stopped by me blowing a hole in them.  I'm okay with that.
A group of parents got a free ride (free in that you and I are paying for it) on Air Force One if they were willing to stand on the bodies of their murdered children and moan for gun control.  I am truly sorry for the loss that these people have suffered.  I understand that the need to do something, to be be able to blame someone for this tragedy is overwhelming. But trying to take away my guns, my freedom, my second amendment rights, is not the answer.  Every one of the latest tragedies that have been ginned up by the msm have one common denominator: a crazy person.
Mental health issues have been the deciding factor in Gabriel Giffords being shot, in the Aurora, Colorado theater shooting, and also in the Sandy Hook tragedy.  It wasn't a high capacity clip that killed these people, it was a crazy, insane whackjob with a gun.  Blame the people who should have seen them coming apart at the seams.  Blame the stupidity of having guns around a person who has proven mental issues.  Blame the A.C.L.U.  for making it harder to put insane people in an institution.  But leave my guns alone.  I may be the person to stop the next rampage.  Or it could be someone like me, a person with a concealed carry permit who has the ability, and the will to stop a crazy person with a gun by using their own weapon.
But back to B.O.- he is very, very worried about "the children."  He is afraid for their safety.  He must be, he surrounds himself with "the children" every time he needs another photo op.  So why is he pro-abortion?
B.O. has absolutely no problem with a baby being partially born, and then having a needle inserted into his or her brain. and killed.  He would hate for one of his daughters to be burdened with an unwanted child.  He actually said that.  Of course, having seen how much those two look like their mother, the only way there will be any sort of pregnancy, planned or unplanned, will be with a large bottle of an alcoholic beverage. And a dark room.
So what age is it that a child deserves to be protected from death?  Is it one month? Six?  Because it certainly isn't while they are being born, that's for sure.  According to B.O., they are still a burden at this point.  Maybe it's when they are cute and can pose for pictures.  Yep, I bet that's it.
Think about when a child should be kept safe.  Think about when it becomes murder.  You'll thank me later.

No comments: