Where is This Baby Store?

I don't own a television for a very good reason. There is only crap on it these days.  I have spoken at length about the last two programs that I watched, and since Dexter is 12 weeks out of the year, I opt not to have the noise for the other 40 weeks.
But in my store   JJDA'S VERY NEEDFUL THINGS LLC   I have a television on when a customer wants to see how it works.  I have noticed an alarming trend that forces me to ask one question.  Where are all of these celebrities buying their babies?
I used to work with a wonderful woman when I was still at the happiest retail establishment on earth.  She and her husband had been trying to have a baby for years when they decided to adopt.  They are stable, normal, hard working, and non crazy.  No history of abuse of any sort, just all around great people.  They went through the twenty miles of hoops to begin adopting a baby.
They also went through the added hoops of fostering a small child in the hopes of having a son or daughter that way.  They are still waiting, not for a baby, but to find the end to the red tape that will allow them to take their new son home with them.
Another friend of mine went through two years of back and forth trying to bring home a Vietnamese child.  Two years and fifty some thousand dollars later, the little girl is still not here.
So how is it that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie can pick up those children like I grab chicken take out after a long day at the shop?
From all the literature I have seen, there are quite a few steps to foreign adoptions, and as I am watching my friend go through it, quite a lot of time involved too.  The idea of just hopping a flight and picking up your fifth, sixth,or eighth child seems wrong to me.
It's not that I don't want to see these poor children find happiness and joy in the United States or where ever the celebrity has dragged them this week for the necessary photo op or cover shot, I just wish I knew where this baby store with no red tape is located.
I would be more than happy to tell my friends and they could thank me later.

What Did He Know and When Did He Know It?

So far the useless media has been almost mute regarding the investigation into Operation Fast and Furious.  Other that some stonewalling from the "most transparent administration      EVER" B.O. really hasn't had many prepared sound bytes for the ongoing investigation. Holder has had gobs and gobs of delay tactics not to mention memos to personnel advising them to shut their pie holes.
 And then I found this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEVM0NrtMqk&feature=share




Call your elected officials and ask them why no one else is making a big deal about murdered Americans that the msm won't cover.  You'll thank me later.

S&P Downgrade

The head of the DNC told me that they own the economy now.  I think she is an idiot, but I do agree with what she said.  The Democrats and B.O. own this economy, no question.  Truman famously had a plaque on his desk that stated "the Buck Stops Here" and the current administration not only has the stopped buck, they have taxed it 60 %.
I read that S&P downgraded our economy specifically because we did not cut enough spending. I also read the talking points ad nauseum from the left of the aisle.  "Hostage takers", "terrorists", "armed thieves", "murderers",  "crazy kidnappers" from the likes of Senator Kerry, Wasserman- Schwartz, Biden, Reid, and Schumer.
I also read that it will take at least eight years for this upgrade to disappear. Good job.
I am very angry when I hear that they are blaming the Tea Party for this.  The Tea Party is doing exactly what I sent them there to do.
When I first went to a Tea Party event, it was because I was scared to death at the run away spending from the joker in the White House right now. Obamacare had just been shoved through, and the always striking Pelosi told me that they had to pass it, so I could see what was in it.  I missed the part where it was published online for three days before they voted on it. Did you?
Why is it that The New York Times can beg for people to volunteer to rake through the emails of Sarah Palin on the desperate chance that they would find something incriminating.  They found nothing, of course, but why wasn't the same fervor applied to the abomination that is Obamacare?
Would they have found that I am now forced to provide free birth control pills to any one that wants them?  What if abortifacients are morally reprehensible to me?  I don't see where I can opt out of paying for them, do you?
This is just one example of the crap that got stuffed into Obamacare while no one was minding the switch.
I also read that the reason S&P was downgrading us into the likes of Belgium was because we have failed to get a handle on out entitlement programs.  Social Security  and Medicare are a giant ponzi scheme that will bankrupt my generation and my children's as well.
Rand Paul crafted a budget that would have had a squared away our problems in ten years. The Senate's response by Harry Reid was to table the bill without a vote. Well done.
In the end, there is one person who is in charge if this mess. He bragged , " We won."
You did alright, Obama. now claim your prize: the first downgrade of our credit since WWII. Well done.
Remember this in November. You'll thank me later.

Wikipedia Vs The News of the World

Wikipedia suborned treason when they encouraged a U.S. military member to steal thousands of military secrets and then in turn published those stories on their website.  Embarrassing facts came to light. Thankfully we were not in a war where those secrets could have caused more damage then they did.  There was a Navy poster from World War II that stated "Loose Lips Sink Ships" and Wikipedia would have sunk a whole fleet with their reckless release of state secrets.
Liberal idiots en mass cried foul, defending the right to know.
Fast forward to the tabloid News of the World. The same liberal idiots are screaming for the literal and punitive destruction of the tabloid because it used less than legal means to acquire the information it used to embarrass various people of note.  What is the difference you ask?  You wonder about the double standard, perhaps?  What could it be? Let's see:  On the one hand we have a blatantly homosexual member of the Armed Forces with an issue with DODT.  His solution to his dislike of the policy that he has sworn to uphold is treason. Liberals from one hill to the other are screaming for the release and protection of this traitor.
On the other hand, in a very similar scenario, A tabloid owned by the corporation run by Rupert Murdoch, enemy number one to those left of center, has been using less than ethical means to find and publish the unsavory private details about officials and others in Europe.  The same bellowing crescendo over Wikipedia becomes a chorus of crickets in regards to News of the World. 
Calls for an investigation in the United States over actions in Europe seem like a giant colossal waste of my taxes.  I like FOX News. It's a nice change of pace from the government sponsored talking points on CBS,NBC,ABC, MSNBC,and CNN.
So is it okay to release damaging information if you are a liberal with malicious intent toward the United States? Ask the folks in charge, and maybe you can thank me later.

Mathew Bartlett vs Casey Anthony

Mathew Bartlett                                                                           Casey Anthony

Employed by TGIFridays                                                             Unemployed

Displayed his middle finger to the prosecuting attorney                   Accused of  killing her daughter and

                                                                                                     leaving her to rot in the woods  

of the Anthony trial                                                                        Accused of not notifying the police that  

                                                                                                     daughter was missing for 30 days

Convicted of contempt, ordered to pay fine of $ 400                     Convicted of lying to police, $4000 fine

 plus $233 in court costs and serve five days in jail

                                                                                                     

Will return to job waiting tables 25k                                               After serving less than a two weeks in 

                                                                                                     jail, leaves in private jet to undisclosed 

                                                                                                     location with potential offers worthmillions 

Properly chastised by Judge                                                          Acquitted by morons who quickly whored  

                                                                                                     their stories

     

                                                                                             

  

                                                                                                                             

I am sure to the waiter at TGIFridays it seemed like a true act of defiance to flip off the Prosecutor in the Anthony Case. Great parenting by his folks, yes?  But what about the background of the idiots who "cried" and "hated having to do it" who let a heartless killer free to pursue the life she dreamed of before being saddled with a precious baby girl?
I heard on the news today that the judge will release the names of the "Idiot Twelve" in October and there is some concern over their safety. Unlike the woman who is not guilty-but it doesn't mean innocent-I hope this bothers them for the rest of their days. They deserve it. They let a baby killer go free.