I have a wide variety of people that I speak to every day. I don't necessarily consider them friends, but they are people that I enjoy speaking to on a semi-regular basis. If I only spoke to people who agreed with the way that I think, I would end up like those angry liberals who couldn't understand George W. Bush being elected when no one they knew voted for him.
But back to the angry lesbian-she is a friend of a brother of a friend of mine. We have shared a meal, not much else. I knew she is a lesbian, her mannish girlfriend was a big indication. She had "married" someone the year before, I guess that didn't work out.
I had posted an opinion on Facebook, denigrating B.O.'s evolving opinion to court the homosexual vote. From every statistic that I can find, homosexuals account for 1.7% of the population. That doesn't sound like much to get worked up over, other than they have the approval of every left wing celebrity on the planet. While they scream, bellow, and demand to be recognized and treated well, they curse, denigrate, and attempt to ridicule anyone who doesn't agree with them. High school and college age children are more open to homosexuality, I suppose all that liberal indoctrination in public schools must be paying off.
Of course-B.O.'s "evolution" toward the acceptance of homosexuality may well have something to do with his repeated fundraisers in Hollywood and his desperate need for all of the liberal deep pockets. I suspect that this "evolution" is one more pandering toward the super liberal out of touch big money bundlers that B.O. caters to. Ironically, Mitt-for-brains raised more money than B.O. did last month.I guess even people who are tepid about him are less tepid at the thought of the destruction of our country's moral fabric.
My post pointed out that if B.O. wants to go after an obscure group for publicity, why not go chasing for the vote of the child molester? That group is estimated to be 1-5% of the population, and since progressives are trying to re-brand them as 'minor attracted' I am certain that very soon we will be getting a barrage of "studies" that tell us these 'minor attracted' isn't a choice- they are born that way.
Why stop there? As I pointed out, those states that currently allow homosexual 'marriages' could go further. I love my dog, she has never been unfaithful. Not counting that she will leave my side in a flash for someone with potato chips-but we are working on that. Why not allow me to 'marry' her, and thus protect my assets for her in the event of my death?
If a homosexual couple want to make sure that their partner has rights in the event of death they have this really cool device: a will. You can leave all of your stuff to whoever, or whatever you want to. If you are that worried about your partner having access to you in an emergency, then go to the hospital and fill out the paper work giving a directive to the hospital allowing that person to make those decisions for you. It's called planning.
Try doing that instead of forcing me to view homosexual couple after couple flout their lifestyle choices. You'll thank me later.
No comments:
Post a Comment