I am heart broken at the death and carnage from the individual who killed all of those people in Aurora. I see others who are refusing to use his name, so that he is denied the vicarious thrill of being named and therefore infamous. I like the idea so much that I couldn't even tell you what that loser's name is. I hope he goes down quickly as a pathetic footnote in history.
I am curious as to why his family has already hired a lawyer. Why do they need a lawyer? I tried to watch her press conference, I really did. I wanted to know more information about this awful person who clearly needed to be stopped. I couldn't make it all the way through the conference because she does this thing with her mouth, it looks like she is licking her teeth, I'm not sure. I imagine it is some sort of nervous tick, I just can't get past it.
I wish I was surprised that ABC rushed right out with the false accusation that this loser was a member of the Tea Party. The odds of two people having the same name must be as high as what? One in two? I am certain that they were engorged at the thought-if you know what I mean. Turns out the blood would have been more useful in their brains, as they failed to do the most basic of checks, and of course, it was a different guy with the same name. Ever met more than one person with the same name? So have I. I guess the concept was lost on the cracker jack team of journalistic integrity that is ABC. Ask me why I don't trust the msm, go ahead.
So now we have two-count 'em-two individuals with no cheese on their cracker and both times the msm broke their legs to blame the people who want less government. While I am pretty sure the first guy was bat crap crazy- I think the second guy is just as sane as most people.
Good thing that they don't have an agenda, isn't it? How many times do they have to be wrong to get the idea that part of reporting the news is getting it right, the first time? How many times do they get to absolutely blow it and still be taken seriously? I can't imagine how misinformed I would be if I only counted on the three networks for my information.
I suppose that we should be thankful for the internet- it is just about the last place where you can get unvarnished information. Thanks again, Algore.
I am not the first to point this out, but it does bare repeating. There was a 71 year old gentleman who stopped an attempted arm robbery and hostage situation by shooting those two cowardly weasels. He had a concealed carry permit and he used it.
If only someone in Colorado had had the same foresightedness. Perhaps we would be reading about a hero instead of the senseless murderous acts perpetrated by this piece of work. I read about one of the victims, he died trying to stop that horrid man. He kept his girlfriend alive. What an amazing man.
I read an idea suggested by someone- I don't remember who- that suggested fixing the problem in a way that the government would love, especially with their taxing overdrive. First tax every able individual one hundred thousand dollars per year for gun control. Immediately waive fifty thousand dollars per year to every person who owns a legally purchased fire arm. Second, waive another twenty five thousand dollars when each person completes a gun safety course. Third, waive another twenty five thousand dollars when each person files an affidavit stating that they carry their gun with them at least one day a week.
The liberals who abhor my ability to protect myself and my family can go ahead and pay the tax, they seem to love taxes, don't they? Every way I look at it, this is a win-win.
So there are two things to consider- make sure that you verify what the msm tells you. And consider asking your elected officials about the new concealed carry tax. You'll thank me later.
No comments:
Post a Comment